Putting on Maslow's Hierachy in Requirements

 Application of Maslow’s Hierachy in Needs Article

Is Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs a Valid Model of Motivation?

by

Melanie Colvin

Fangfang Rutland

May well 8th, 2008

Table of Contents

I actually. Executive summary

II. Intro

III. Maslow and Maslow's theory

a. Biographical design

b. Simple structure of Maslow's hierarchy of requires theory c. Inspiration for " Structure of Needs” theory

IV. Application of Maslow's theory

a. Maslow's theory in business

1 ) Workplace supervision

2 . Marketing

b. Maslow's theory in psychotherapy

c. Maslow's theory in the healthcare industry

d. Maslow's theory in social science

Sixth is v. Theories based on Maslow

a. Motivation-Hygiene Theory

b. Wilber

VI. Empirical studies upon Maslow's theory

a. Encouraging findings

1 ) Porter

2 . Alderfer

a few. Reiss & Havercamp

5. Ghiselli & Johnson

a few. Guttman Level Test

m. Non-supportive studies

VII. Maslow's theory throughout cultures

VIII. Summary and Conclusion

Executive Summary

This is paper attempts to resolve the question " Is Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs a Valid model of Motivation? ”. We all begin by reviewing Maslow's existence and the simple structure of his Hierarchy of Needs Theory. After that continue by simply explaining what inspired his theory. The use of this theory is evaluated as used in business, Psychotherapy, the healthcare industry, and social scientific research. Similar theories are reviewed including Frederick Herzberg's Motivation-Hygiene Theory and Ken Wilbur's theory because interpreted by Rowan. After that we take a review of Empirical tests of Maslow's work to try to determine if his model can be valid. A report by Lounge and Nougian did not support Maslow's theory. However , there are a few studies that show support or part support. A literature review includes evaluations of research done by Tenir, Alderfer, Reiss and Havercamp, and Ghiselli and Manley as well as the Guttman scale test. Although some argue that Maslow's pecking order of needs theory is restricted by nationwide and social boundaries, we look at its work with across cultures. Finally we reach the conclusion that Maslow's hierarchy is a valid model of inspiration, though a few modification may be warranted. It is just a simple nevertheless powerful principle that can help all of us understand, develop and make use of human potential. Introduction

Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory is more than half a century old as its first publication of Character and Determination in 1954. Many theoretical and useful applications were developed on the basis of Maslow's theory (Brenner, Carmack, & Weinstein, 1971. Rowan, 1999. Sirgy, 1986. Shermer, 2004. Seeley, 1992). The scope and scale of the use of Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory transcends a wide range of areas. However , despite of their popularity, the validity and utility with this theory include raised a large number of controversies over time. On one hand, Maslow's theory is incredibly intuitive (Heylighen, 1992), straightforward and apply. Being one of the many enduring hypotheses of behavioral science, Maslow's " Pecking order of Needs” holds high face validity. On the other hand, various questioned the validity and applicability from the theory (Wahba & Bridwell, 1976. McCarth & Perreault, 1984). A few claimed that Maslow's theory has been applied without sufficient scientific data (Soper, Milford & Rosenthal, 1995). You will discover studies that show support or partially support of the theory (Lawler & Tenir, 1967. Ghiselli & Johnson, 1970. Manning & Curtis, 1988. Benson & Dundis, 2003. Barling 1976. Lounge & Nougaim, 1968. Porat, 1977. Reiss & Havercamp 2005), even though some found not any evidence to back up the theory (Hall & Nougaim, 1968. Lawler & Suttle, 1972).

The objective of our daily news is to review Maslow's structure of requirements theory, assessment its opinions and examine its applications. Our conventional paper is to analyze whether Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory is a valid theory of...

References: Al-Meer, A. R. 1996. A comparison of the Will need Importance Composition Between Saudis and Westerners. Journal of Management Development, Vol. 12-15, 5: 56-64

Bardwell, P. L

Barling, J. We. 1976. A great Empirical Check of the Profession Stages Substitute for Maslow 's Need Pecking order Concept in a single Industrial Setting. South African Journal of Psychology. 6th.

Benson, S. G. & Dundis, S. P. 2003. Understanding and Motivating Medical care Employees: Integrating Maslow is actually Hierarchy of Needs, Teaching and Technology. Journal of nursing management, 11: 315-320.

Black, F & William, R. 1971, Psychology at the office. Great Britain: Penguin books.

Straight-forward P & Jones Meters. 1986. Managerial Motivation in Kenya and Malawi: a Cross -- cultural Comparison. The Journal of Modern Photography equipment Studies, Volume. 42, you: 165-175.

Chiaramonte, P. and Mills, A. J. 1993. Counseling Home Reflection because an Instrument in Organizational Learning. British Record of Advice and Guidance, Vol. 21, 2: 145-155.

Chung, Kae H., Upper Illinois University, 1969. A Markov Chain Model of Individual Needs: An Extension of Maslow's Need Theory. The Academy of Administration Journal. Volume. 12, Number 2 . (Jun., 1969), l. 223-234

Cullen, D

Absorb dyes, Mills and Weatherbee (2005). Maslow: Guy Interrupted: Studying Management Theory in Framework. Management Decision, Vol. 43. 10: 375-95.

Eckerman, A. C. 1968. A New Take a look at Need Theory – Action of Maslow 's Pecking order. Training and Development Diary.

Gambrel, Tanker A & Cianci, Ur. 2003. Maslow 's Structure of Needs: Does it Apply in Collectivist Culture. Diary of Utilized Management and Entrepreneurship, Volume. 8, a couple of: 143-162.

Ghiselli, Edwin At the. & Johnson, Douglas A. 1970. Require Satisfaction, Bureaucratic Success, and Organizational Composition. Personnel Mindset, 23: 569-576.

Gibson, Honest K. & Teasley, Clyde E., College or university of Georgia. The Humanistic Model of Company Motivation: A Review of Research Support. Public Government Review, Volume. 33, No . 1 . (Jan. Feb., 1973), p. 89-96.

Gibson, L. L., Ivancevich, J. Meters., & Donnelly Jr., J. H. 1994, Organizations. Boston, MA: Irwin.

Hall, Meters. H. late 1960s. A Chat With Abraham Maslow. Mindset Today, 37.

Hall, D. T. & Nougaim, K. E. 1968, An Study of Maslow 's Need Hierarchy in an Company Setting. Company Behavior (2nd ed). Ny: McGraw-Hill.

Herzberg, F. 1966, Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland, OH: Universe.

Hergenhahn, W. R. june 2006, An Introduction for the History of Psychology (5th male impotence. ), Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

Heylighen, Farrenheit. 1992. A Cognitive-Systematic Renovation of Maslow 's Theory of Self- Actualization. Behavioral Science, Volume. 37, 1: 39-59.

Hjelle, L. A. & Zeigler, D. J., 1976, Personality Theory: Basic Assumption, Study and Applications, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kets para Vires. 78. The Midcareer Conundrum. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 7 2: 45-62.

Kickul, J., Lester, S. W. and Belgio, E. 2004, Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of Psychological Contract Breach: A Combination Cultural A comparison of the United States and Hong Kong Chinese language. International Log of Cross Cultural Supervision, Vol. four, 2: 229.

Kotler, P, Lilien, G. L. & Moorthy, T. S. 1991, Marketing Supervision Analysis, Organizing, Implementation and Control (7th ed. ). Eaglewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kuo, Y. Farreneheit. and Chen, L. S i9000. 2004. Individual Demographic Dissimilarities and Work satisfaction Amongst Information Technology Workers: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. International Journal of Management, Vol. 21. a couple of: 221.

Laas, I. 06\. Self-actualization and Society: A New Application To get An Old Theory. Journal of Humanistic Mindset.

Larry Hjelle & Daniel Ziegler, 1976, Personality Hypotheses (3rd male impotence. ). Nyc: Mcgraw-Hill.

Lawler, E. E & Avoir, L. W. 1967. The Effect of Overall performance On Job Satisfaction. Industrial Relations, 7, 1: 20-28.

Lawler, E. E. & Suttle, T. L. 1972. A Causal Correlation Test out of the Want Hierarchy Principle. Organizational Tendencies and Human Performance, several: 265-287.

Lawler, E. At the. 1973, Determination in work organizations. Monterey, CALIFORNIA: Brooks/Cole.

Lowry, R. L. 1979, The Journals of A. H. Maslow, Vol. My spouse and i and 2, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

Lynda Juall Carpenito-Moyet. 2003. Medical Forum, Volume. 38, installment payments on your

Lyon, They would. L., Ivancevich, J. M. and Donnelly, J. H. 1970. The motivation Profile of Management Researchers. Operations Study, Vol. nineteen, 6.

MaCarth, J. At the & Perreault, D. Watts. 1984, Basic Marketing. Homewood, IL.

Manning, N. & Curtis, F. 1988, Man Behavior: How come People Perform What They Do. Cincinnati oh.: Vista Devices publishing.

Maslow, A. They would. 1943. A Theory of Human Determination. Psychological review, 50: 370 – 396.

Maslow, A. H. 1954, Motivation and Personality. New york city: Harper & Row.

Maslow, A. They would. 1965, Euphachian Management. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.

Maslow, A. H. 1968, Toward a Psychology penalized. New York: Vehicle Nostrand Reinhold Co.

Maslow, A. They would. 1970, Motivation and Personality (2nd ed). New York: Harper and Line.

Maslow, A. H. year 1971, The A greater distance Reaches of Human Nature. Nyc: Viking.

McGregor, D. 60, The Human Area of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Meleis, A. I. 1991, Theoretical Nursing jobs: Development and Progress, subsequent edition. Phila.: J. B. Lippincott Co.

Nevis, E. G. 1983. Cultural Presumptions and Productivity: The United States and China. Sloan Management Assessment, Vol twenty four, 3: 17-29.

Porat, Bill. 1977. Guttman Scale Check for Maslow Need Pecking order. The Record of Mindset, 1977, 97, 85-92.

Reiss, Steven and Havercamp, Leslie M. june 2006. Motivation in Developmental Framework: A New Means for Studying Self-Actualization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. forty-five, 1: 41-53.

Roberts, T. B. 1982. Comment on Mathes 's article. Journal of Humanistic Mindset, Vol twenty-two, 4: 97-98.

Rowan, Steve. 1999. Ascent and Descent in Maslow's Theory. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 39, several: 125-133.

Sanford, A. C. 1970. A cross ethnic study of industrial motivation. The southern area of quarterly, eight: 146-161.

Seeley, E. 1992. Human requires and buyer economics: the implications of Maslow 's theory of motivation for consumer costs patterns. Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 21 years old, 4.

Shermer, M. 2004, The science great and bad. New York: Instances Books.

Shoura, M. M. & Singh, A. 98. Motivation parameters for executive managers employing Maslow is theory. Diary of supervision in anatomist, Vol. 15, 5.

Sirgy, M. M. 1986. A quality-of-life theory derived from Maslow 's developing perspective: 'quality ' is related to progressive pleasure of a hierarchy of requirements, lower order and bigger. American Log of Economics and Sociology, Vol. forty-five, 3.

Soper, B, Milford, G. & Rosenthal, G. 1995. Idea when proof does not support theory. Mindset and advertising.

Stanton W. J. & Futrell, C. 1987, Fundamentals of marketing. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.

Wahba, M. A., &, Bridwell, L. G. 1976, Maslow reconsidered: a review of research on the need structure theory. Company behavior and human functionality, 15: 212-241.

Wilber, T. 1995. Love-making, ecology, spiritual techniques. Boston: Shambhala.

theory of beams Dissertation

News